RSS | About | Contact  

Archive for February, 2007

My insides are all wrong

Friday, February 16th, 2007 at 8:36 pm

Despite my ongoing stomach problems a few years back, I haven’t actually spewed for a good ten years or so. But that all changed in the early hours of Tuesday morning when chunks were most certainly blown - but oddly, none of which were carrots.

I must’ve been a harder bastard in my younger days, as I ended up crying each & every time on this occasion. It felt like my innards were being ripped out - that I was forcing up shards of glass from the depths of my stomachy pit.

So yes, not pleasant - though I’ve escaped recent years with nothing more than minor ailments so I’m not going to complain. It just hurt like a fother mucker.

Still, I’ve had the bulk of the week off - a week’s worth of Loose Women! - and am feeling much better now.

Bringing everything together

Monday, February 12th, 2007 at 2:49 pm

Forgetting the choice of clips and somewhat sloppy editing, I think this‘d make an excellent addition to the scene if Lucas were to release a revised ’saga’ edition. You know, in the inevitable boxset.

This could be incorporated too.

On the rory, it’s the OB

Thursday, February 8th, 2007 at 1:20 pm

Well what’dya know? Months after requesting such an item, a full squad photograph has materialised on the official The Bill website.

___

I’ve always thought a forum for The Bill called The Billboard was a great idea, but nobody’s ever done it. I’m half tempted to write in and suggest they start one. Because I can.

One: Cut a hole in a box

Tuesday, February 6th, 2007 at 12:17 pm

Ha ha, excellent!

I’m a PC

Monday, February 5th, 2007 at 1:49 pm

Charlie Brooker’s Screenwipe returns tonight for a third series. Joy! But ahead of that, read his excellent article about hating Macs here.

(I HATE people blindly copying & pasting articles into their own blogs without additional comment. But I couldn’t agree more with what Brooker’s said, so I’m going to quote the whole thing here to ensure all you Mac lovers at Racodac - and Hob McD - read it.)

I hate Macs

Charlie Brooker
Monday February 5, 2007
The Guardian

Unless you have been walking around with your eyes closed, and your head encased in a block of concrete, with a blindfold tied round it, in the dark - unless you have been doing that, you surely can’t have failed to notice the current Apple Macintosh campaign starring David Mitchell and Robert Webb, which has taken over magazines, newspapers and the internet in a series of brutal coordinated attacks aimed at causing massive loss of resistance. While I don’t have anything against shameless promotion per se (after all, within these very brackets I’m promoting my own BBC4 show, which starts tonight at 10pm), there is something infuriating about this particular blitz. In the ads, Webb plays a Mac while Mitchell adopts the mantle of a PC. We know this because they say so right at the start of the ad.

“Hello, I’m a Mac,” says Webb.

“And I’m a PC,” adds Mitchell.

They then perform a small comic vignette aimed at highlighting the differences between the two computers. So in one, the PC has a “nasty virus” that makes him sneeze like a plague victim; in another, he keeps freezing up and having to reboot. This is a subtle way of saying PCs are unreliable. Mitchell, incidentally, is wearing a nerdy, conservative suit throughout, while Webb is dressed in laid-back contemporary casual wear. This is a subtle way of saying Macs are cool.

The ads are adapted from a near-identical American campaign - the only difference is the use of Mitchell and Webb. They are a logical choice in one sense (everyone likes them), but a curious choice in another, since they are best known for the television series Peep Show - probably the best sitcom of the past five years - in which Mitchell plays a repressed, neurotic underdog, and Webb plays a selfish, self-regarding poseur. So when you see the ads, you think, “PCs are a bit rubbish yet ultimately lovable, whereas Macs are just smug, preening tossers.” In other words, it is a devastatingly accurate campaign.

I hate Macs. I have always hated Macs. I hate people who use Macs. I even hate people who don’t use Macs but sometimes wish they did. Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.

PCs are the ramshackle computers of the people. You can build your own from scratch, then customise it into oblivion. Sometimes you have to slap it to make it work properly, just like the Tardis (Doctor Who, incidentally, would definitely use a PC). PCs have charm; Macs ooze pretension. When I sit down to use a Mac, the first thing I think is, “I hate Macs”, and then I think, “Why has this rubbish aspirational ornament only got one mouse button?” Losing that second mouse button feels like losing a limb. If the ads were really honest, Webb would be standing there with one arm, struggling to open a packet of peanuts while Mitchell effortlessly tore his apart with both hands. But then, if the ads were really honest, Webb would be dressed in unbelievably po-faced avant-garde clothing with a gigantic glowing apple on his back. And instead of conducting a proper conversation, he would be repeatedly congratulating himself for looking so cool, and banging on about how he was going to use his new laptop to write a novel, without ever getting round to doing it, like a mediocre idiot.

Cue 10 years of nasal bleating from Mac-likers who profess to like Macs not because they are fashionable, but because “they are just better”. Mac owners often sneer that kind of defence back at you when you mock their silly, posturing contraptions, because in doing so, you have inadvertently put your finger on the dark fear haunting their feeble, quivering soul - that in some sense, they are a superficial semi-person assembled from packaging; an infinitely sad, second-rate replicant who doesn’t really know what they are doing here, but feels vaguely significant and creative each time they gaze at their sleek designer machine. And the more deftly constructed and wittily argued their defence, the more terrified and wounded they secretly are.

Aside from crowing about sartorial differences, the adverts also make a big deal about PCs being associated with “work stuff” (Boo! Offices! Boo!), as opposed to Macs, which are apparently better at “fun stuff”. How insecure is that? And how inaccurate? Better at “fun stuff”, my arse. The only way to have fun with a Mac is to poke its insufferable owner in the eye. For proof, stroll into any decent games shop and cast your eye over the exhaustive range of cutting-edge computer games available exclusively for the PC, then compare that with the sort of rubbish you get on the Mac. Myst, the most pompous and boring videogame of all time, a plodding, dismal “adventure” in which you wandered around solving tedious puzzles in a rubbish magic kingdom apparently modelled on pretentious album covers, originated on the Mac in 1993. That same year, the first shoot-’em-up game, Doom, was released on the PC. This tells you all you will ever need to know about the Mac’s relationship with “fun”.

Ultimately the campaign’s biggest flaw is that it perpetuates the notion that consumers somehow “define themselves” with the technology they choose. If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that “says something” about your personality, don’t bother. You don’t have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. Of course, that hasn’t stopped me slagging off Mac owners, with a series of sweeping generalisations, for the past 900 words, but that is what the ads do to PCs. Besides, that’s what we PC owners are like - unreliable, idiosyncratic and gleefully unfair. And if you’ll excuse me now, I feel an unexpected crash coming.

This week: Charlie watched some episodes of Larry Sanders (on his PC). He played the customised Fawlty Towers map for Counterstrike (on his PC). He listened to the Windows startup jingle every 10 minutes as his PC repeatedly rebooted itself.

___

Comment: Hello. Charlie Brooker here.

I wrote this piffle. Then it was subbed. And whoever subbed it decided to add a bit describing Doom as “the first shoot-em-up game”.

Words fail me.

They also changed every abbreviation — so “they’re” becomes “they are” and “it’s” becomes “it is”, and so on — presumably in an attempt to inject a bit more plodding, impersonal joylessness to the whole thing.

Bet they did it on a Mac, too.

Do the Mario!

Monday, February 5th, 2007 at 12:46 pm

I remember getting up and dancing to this. Back in the day, like.

Christmas II

Monday, February 5th, 2007 at 12:38 pm

Ha ha, this is fantastic.

Flying man with tight pants

Monday, February 5th, 2007 at 11:27 am

I’m ambivalent about Superman Returns. I watched it straight after Clerks II last night/this morning and did see it through to the end - which is a good sign. But I dunno, it felt a bit flat - nothing particularly gripped me.

The trailer looked great and the film was far from disappointing. (Sad, but I especially liked the title sequence, how they’d stayed faithful to the original Superman film(s) - as with the date on the meteorite et cetera.) It just wasn’t quite as KAPOW! as I thought it’d be.

You’re not even supposed to be here today

Sunday, February 4th, 2007 at 11:56 pm

So I’ve finally seen Clerks II - a whole two weeks before it’s officially released on DVD - courtesy of Atul K. Aren’t I the bees knees?

It didn’t disappoint at all. Nay, it was excellent. Very funny. I couldn’t agree more with Randall’s LotR walking speech. In fact, I did a very similar skit three years back (and plenty of times since) and thought I was being pretty original - whereas now I just think I simply acted out what every other munchkin was thinking. Gah.

Anyway newcomer Rosario Dawson, whom I’d feared being a weak link, really shone. And the end of the film was really fitting - incredibly sentimental. I love suture and this film does it brilliantly.

With ass to mouth.