RSS | About | Contact  

Archive for the 'technology' category

Pirate film

Saturday, June 30th, 2007 at 11:30 am

I finally got around to seeing Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End last night. Well, all but the last half-hour or so as the projector broke. Typical.

I’d have seen it sooner to raise my spirits between projects, but I agreed last year to wait and see it with Katherine McK. having seen Dead Man’s Chest with her. Only, she decided to watch it without me a few weeks back being the girl she is. And a ginger one at that. So I instead went with Sam S. and his ladyfriend, Kate last night.

Elliot S, who definitely didn’t want to come and see the film on Thursday when we were originally going to see it - because he’d already seen it, decided he’d come along after all. So the four of us made our merry way down to Greenwich for a night of swashbuckling action.

What I saw of the film was really good, though it started very slowly - it should’ve started just before Jack Sparrow was first seen in Davey Jones’ Locker.

’twas a really fun night. With many thanks to Sam for picking me up & bringing me home again.

Hate your fridge

Tuesday, March 13th, 2007 at 11:04 pm

It’s taken over two years to resume Star Trek: The Screen Voyages but I’ve now re-visited III & IV in a bid to maintain sane whilst rotoscoping travelling mattes for my animation. It’s such a painful, tedious process and it’s not helped by varying framerates being forced upon individual image sequences. Nay, it’s damned annoying.

Very nearly finished now, but then I have spent the last month living & breathing the blasted thing - the last two weeks of which I’ve been stuck at my desk.

I think I’ve gone a bit peculiar to tell you the truth; I got such pleasure yesterday in decapitating the penguin character models I made for this animation. I even did the cackling laugh.

Blame Canada

Saturday, February 24th, 2007 at 4:16 pm

A wee visit to Atul K’s this morning to rectify his lack of Internet connection was unexpected, but a pleasant reunion all the same.

As well as the usual geekish talk that you’d expect of us (the gloss-finish of his Spider-Man 2 poster being a fine example), he said that he’d seen my idents on the Paramount Comedy channel, which is just wizard!

Also amusingly, he thought this was a condom packet - because of the words “slant tip” above the phallic outline.

In fairness, he did add: “I wasn’t sure as I didn’t think condoms needed sharpening.” Bless ‘im.

This, too, saw us laughing muchly.

I’m a PC

Monday, February 5th, 2007 at 1:49 pm

Charlie Brooker’s Screenwipe returns tonight for a third series. Joy! But ahead of that, read his excellent article about hating Macs here.

(I HATE people blindly copying & pasting articles into their own blogs without additional comment. But I couldn’t agree more with what Brooker’s said, so I’m going to quote the whole thing here to ensure all you Mac lovers at Racodac - and Hob McD - read it.)

I hate Macs

Charlie Brooker
Monday February 5, 2007
The Guardian

Unless you have been walking around with your eyes closed, and your head encased in a block of concrete, with a blindfold tied round it, in the dark - unless you have been doing that, you surely can’t have failed to notice the current Apple Macintosh campaign starring David Mitchell and Robert Webb, which has taken over magazines, newspapers and the internet in a series of brutal coordinated attacks aimed at causing massive loss of resistance. While I don’t have anything against shameless promotion per se (after all, within these very brackets I’m promoting my own BBC4 show, which starts tonight at 10pm), there is something infuriating about this particular blitz. In the ads, Webb plays a Mac while Mitchell adopts the mantle of a PC. We know this because they say so right at the start of the ad.

“Hello, I’m a Mac,” says Webb.

“And I’m a PC,” adds Mitchell.

They then perform a small comic vignette aimed at highlighting the differences between the two computers. So in one, the PC has a “nasty virus” that makes him sneeze like a plague victim; in another, he keeps freezing up and having to reboot. This is a subtle way of saying PCs are unreliable. Mitchell, incidentally, is wearing a nerdy, conservative suit throughout, while Webb is dressed in laid-back contemporary casual wear. This is a subtle way of saying Macs are cool.

The ads are adapted from a near-identical American campaign - the only difference is the use of Mitchell and Webb. They are a logical choice in one sense (everyone likes them), but a curious choice in another, since they are best known for the television series Peep Show - probably the best sitcom of the past five years - in which Mitchell plays a repressed, neurotic underdog, and Webb plays a selfish, self-regarding poseur. So when you see the ads, you think, “PCs are a bit rubbish yet ultimately lovable, whereas Macs are just smug, preening tossers.” In other words, it is a devastatingly accurate campaign.

I hate Macs. I have always hated Macs. I hate people who use Macs. I even hate people who don’t use Macs but sometimes wish they did. Macs are glorified Fisher-Price activity centres for adults; computers for scaredy cats too nervous to learn how proper computers work; computers for people who earnestly believe in feng shui.

PCs are the ramshackle computers of the people. You can build your own from scratch, then customise it into oblivion. Sometimes you have to slap it to make it work properly, just like the Tardis (Doctor Who, incidentally, would definitely use a PC). PCs have charm; Macs ooze pretension. When I sit down to use a Mac, the first thing I think is, “I hate Macs”, and then I think, “Why has this rubbish aspirational ornament only got one mouse button?” Losing that second mouse button feels like losing a limb. If the ads were really honest, Webb would be standing there with one arm, struggling to open a packet of peanuts while Mitchell effortlessly tore his apart with both hands. But then, if the ads were really honest, Webb would be dressed in unbelievably po-faced avant-garde clothing with a gigantic glowing apple on his back. And instead of conducting a proper conversation, he would be repeatedly congratulating himself for looking so cool, and banging on about how he was going to use his new laptop to write a novel, without ever getting round to doing it, like a mediocre idiot.

Cue 10 years of nasal bleating from Mac-likers who profess to like Macs not because they are fashionable, but because “they are just better”. Mac owners often sneer that kind of defence back at you when you mock their silly, posturing contraptions, because in doing so, you have inadvertently put your finger on the dark fear haunting their feeble, quivering soul - that in some sense, they are a superficial semi-person assembled from packaging; an infinitely sad, second-rate replicant who doesn’t really know what they are doing here, but feels vaguely significant and creative each time they gaze at their sleek designer machine. And the more deftly constructed and wittily argued their defence, the more terrified and wounded they secretly are.

Aside from crowing about sartorial differences, the adverts also make a big deal about PCs being associated with “work stuff” (Boo! Offices! Boo!), as opposed to Macs, which are apparently better at “fun stuff”. How insecure is that? And how inaccurate? Better at “fun stuff”, my arse. The only way to have fun with a Mac is to poke its insufferable owner in the eye. For proof, stroll into any decent games shop and cast your eye over the exhaustive range of cutting-edge computer games available exclusively for the PC, then compare that with the sort of rubbish you get on the Mac. Myst, the most pompous and boring videogame of all time, a plodding, dismal “adventure” in which you wandered around solving tedious puzzles in a rubbish magic kingdom apparently modelled on pretentious album covers, originated on the Mac in 1993. That same year, the first shoot-’em-up game, Doom, was released on the PC. This tells you all you will ever need to know about the Mac’s relationship with “fun”.

Ultimately the campaign’s biggest flaw is that it perpetuates the notion that consumers somehow “define themselves” with the technology they choose. If you truly believe you need to pick a mobile phone that “says something” about your personality, don’t bother. You don’t have a personality. A mental illness, maybe - but not a personality. Of course, that hasn’t stopped me slagging off Mac owners, with a series of sweeping generalisations, for the past 900 words, but that is what the ads do to PCs. Besides, that’s what we PC owners are like - unreliable, idiosyncratic and gleefully unfair. And if you’ll excuse me now, I feel an unexpected crash coming.

This week: Charlie watched some episodes of Larry Sanders (on his PC). He played the customised Fawlty Towers map for Counterstrike (on his PC). He listened to the Windows startup jingle every 10 minutes as his PC repeatedly rebooted itself.

___

Comment: Hello. Charlie Brooker here.

I wrote this piffle. Then it was subbed. And whoever subbed it decided to add a bit describing Doom as “the first shoot-em-up game”.

Words fail me.

They also changed every abbreviation — so “they’re” becomes “they are” and “it’s” becomes “it is”, and so on — presumably in an attempt to inject a bit more plodding, impersonal joylessness to the whole thing.

Bet they did it on a Mac, too.

As stupid does

Wednesday, January 17th, 2007 at 9:40 am

I’ve just got a text message saying: "This is my new number - John". Now not being funny, but how is that in any way helpful given John is one of the most common names in the world?

Annoying Indeed

Saturday, October 7th, 2006 at 11:29 pm

Forgetting the fact that I’ve had the film brand new and sealed on my shelf since my birthday last year, I tried giving AI: Artificial Intelligence a viewing the night before last all to have the disc freeze halfway into the film.

It was far too late to battle with the disc and player, so I decided to go to sleep. But trying to resume playback today, my standalone DVD player won’t move beyond the point it froze on before (skipping chapters, fast-forwarding etc. doesn’t work), it continuously whirrs in both my computer and server downstairs, and my Xbox plain won’t recognise the disc.

I know I’ve said it before - and I do love DVD - but you never have all these problems with VHS. VHS is reliable. Less faffing around. In all of my life, I’ve only ever had two tapes get chewed up. Whereas I can name NINE brand new, genuine region 2 DVDs I’ve bought this year alone that I’ve had troubles with. Not on.

As for finishing AI, I’m hoping the deluxe player in the living room will handle it, as I was really getting into the film. And it’d be unbelievably ridiculous to have to buy it again. Although that is an eventuality I have explored (begrudgingly) before.

A thousand words

Thursday, July 20th, 2006 at 6:09 pm

Demons to some, angels to others

Monday, April 10th, 2006 at 10:51 pm

Typical. I haven’t really been on my computer for a week and now that I’m back, Tetris has stopped working - even though this is my computer, which nobody else touches.

Gripping yarn

Saturday, March 25th, 2006 at 11:46 pm

An absence of crimpers and RJ45s did not stop me from successfully repairing my network connection a short moment ago. ’tis annoying how the connection was broken in the first place: cables tangled, USB extension retrieved a bit too forcefully, connection block coming loose at end of CAT5 UTP (hey, it happens). But Internet equilibrium has now been reinstated in the world of BigBlake - and all in under three minutes. An impressive time, I’m sure you’ll agree.

If I were a drive, I’d be well hard

Sunday, February 12th, 2006 at 7:39 pm

Computer hard drive increasage and a sixth golden coin have today made me feel a happy chappy.

The happy chappy in question is reportedly not best pleased about this.